FTMO vs FunderPro
Two prop firms compared on funding, profit splits, challenge rules, and payouts.
Last updated: March 21, 2026
Quick Verdict
FTMO wins this comparison — 3 out of 5 categories.
Our analysts reviewed both options across pricing, reputation, and trading conditions. FTMO came out ahead based on our scoring criteria. Read each category below for the full breakdown.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Pricing
FunderPro winsOn pricing, FunderPro offers better value. Its challenge fee starts at N/A, which is lower than FTMO's From €155 (€10K) to €1,080 (€200K). For traders watching their costs, FunderPro represents a more affordable path to funded trading.
FTMOFrom €155 (€10K) to €1,080 (€200K)
FunderProFrom $99Drawdown Rules
FTMO applies more lenient drawdown rules, giving traders more room to manage losing periods. Its daily drawdown limit is 5% and maximum drawdown is 10%. By contrast, FunderPro enforces a N/A daily limit and N/A max, which is stricter and can lead to more failed challenges.
FTMO10%FunderPro10%Trading Platforms
FTMO winsFTMO supports more trading platforms, giving traders greater choice in how they execute their strategy. It offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade, while FunderPro offers standard platform access.
FTMOFunderProReputation & Trust
FunderPro winsFunderPro has built a stronger reputation among funded traders. With an EntryLab rating of 4.90/10, it outperforms FTMO, which scores 4.80/10 on our platform. Reputation matters especially in the prop trading space where payout reliability is paramount.
FTMO4.80FunderPro4.90Scaling & Max Funding
FTMO winsBoth firms offer equivalent maximum funding levels. Neither has an advantage for traders looking to scale.
FTMO$2,000,000FunderPro$200,000Profit Split & Payouts
FTMO offers a superior profit-sharing arrangement. Traders keep up to 80% (up to 90% with scaling) of profits, with payouts Biweekly. FunderPro offers N/A with standard payouts, which is less favourable for traders maximising their earnings.
FTMO80% (up to 90% with scaling)FunderPro80% (up to 90%)Challenge Structure
FTMO winsFTMO provides more flexibility in how traders can get funded. It offers {"2-Step Challenge (Standard)","2-Step Challenge (Aggressive)"}, compared to FunderPro's standard evaluation. With a profit target of 10% (Phase 1), 5% (Phase 2), FTMO also sets a more achievable bar for traders looking to pass their evaluation.
FTMOFunderProOur Pick
FTMO Wins This Round
Based on our side-by-side analysis, FTMO edges ahead in this matchup. Get started today.
Visit FTMOReady to Choose?
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FTMO better than FunderPro?
Based on our analysis across 7 categories, FTMO wins overall. It outperforms FunderPro in areas including Challenge Structure and Profit Split & Payouts. That said, both firms are reputable options for funded traders.
Which has better profit split, FTMO or FunderPro?
FTMO offers the higher profit split. FTMO offers up to 80% (up to 90% with scaling) while FunderPro offers N/A.
Is FTMO trustworthy?
FTMO holds an EntryLab rating of 4.80/10 based on our editorial review. We evaluate prop firms on payouts, challenge fairness, support quality, and regulatory standing. Always conduct your own due diligence before funding a challenge.
Which has a cheaper challenge fee, FTMO or FunderPro?
FunderPro offers the more affordable challenge. FTMO starts at From €155 (€10K) to €1,080 (€200K) and FunderPro starts at N/A.
What is the maximum funding at FTMO vs FunderPro?
FTMO offers maximum funded accounts of ,000,000, while FunderPro offers up to N/A. Both allow traders to scale their accounts over time.
Which is better for beginner traders, FTMO or FunderPro?
FTMO may be more beginner-friendly due to its lower entry fee and clear challenge structure. Both firms have challenges suitable for traders at different skill levels.