FundedNext vs TX3 Funding

On pricing, TX3 Funding offers better value. Its challenge fee starts at N/A, which is lower than FundedNext's From $32 to $999. For traders watching their costs, TX3 Funding represents a more affordable path to funded trading.

FundedNext applies more lenient drawdown rules, giving traders more room to manage losing periods. Its daily drawdown limit is 3% (1-Step) / 5% (2-Step) and maximum drawdown is 6% (1-Step) / 10% (2-Step). By contrast, TX3 Funding enforces a N/A daily limit and N/A max, which is stricter and can lead to more failed challenges.

FundedNext supports more trading platforms, giving traders greater choice in how they execute their strategy. It offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, Match Trader, Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, while TX3 Funding offers standard platform access.

FundedNext has built a stronger reputation among funded traders. With an EntryLab rating of 4.60/10, it outperforms TX3 Funding, which scores 4.40/10 on our platform. Reputation matters especially in the prop trading space where payout reliability is paramount.

FundedNext offers higher maximum funding, making it the better choice for traders looking to scale up. Funded accounts can reach $4,000,000 (scaled from $300K), compared to TX3 Funding's maximum of N/A. For serious traders focused on growing their account size, FundedNext has the edge.

FundedNext offers a superior profit-sharing arrangement. Traders keep up to 80-95% of profits, with payouts On demand (24-hour guarantee). TX3 Funding offers N/A with standard payouts, which is less favourable for traders maximising their earnings.

FundedNext provides more flexibility in how traders can get funded. It offers {"Stellar 1-Step","Stellar 2-Step","Stellar Lite"}, compared to TX3 Funding's standard evaluation. With a profit target of 10% (1-Step), 8% + 5% (2-Step), FundedNext also sets a more achievable bar for traders looking to pass their evaluation.