EntryLab
Head-to-Head

FTMO vs FundedNext

Two prop firms compared on funding, profit splits, challenge rules, and payouts.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

vs
FundedNext

FundedNext

9.2/10

★ Winner

Quick Verdict

FundedNext wins this comparison 3 out of 4 categories.

Our analysts reviewed both options across pricing, reputation, and trading conditions. FundedNext came out ahead based on our scoring criteria. Read each category below for the full breakdown.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature
FTMO
WinnerFundedNext
Our Rating9.6/109.2/10
Profit Split80–90%95%
Max Funding$2M$4M
Evaluation Fee$From €155 (€10K) to €1,080 (€200K)$From $32 to $999
Max Drawdown10%6–10%
PayoutsBiweeklyOn Demand
1

Pricing

FundedNext wins

On pricing, FundedNext offers better value. Its challenge fee starts at from $32, which is lower than FTMO's from $155. For traders watching their costs, FundedNext represents a more affordable path to funded trading.

FTMOFTMOFrom €155 (€10K) to €1,080 (€200K)
VS
FundedNextFundedNextFrom $32 to $999
✓ WINS
2

Drawdown Rules

Both firms apply similar drawdown rules. Neither has a meaningful edge in this category.

FTMOFTMO10%
≡ DRAW
VS
FundedNextFundedNext6% (1-Step) / 10% (2-Step)
≡ DRAW
3

Trading Platforms

Both firms offer the same platform options, so neither has an advantage in this category.

FTMOFTMO
≡ DRAW
VS
FundedNextFundedNext
≡ DRAW
4

Reputation & Trust

FTMO wins

FTMO has built a stronger reputation among funded traders. With an EntryLab rating of 4.80/10, it outperforms FundedNext, which scores 4.60/10 on our platform. Reputation matters especially in the prop trading space where payout reliability is paramount.

FTMOFTMO4.80
✓ WINS
VS
FundedNextFundedNext4.60
5

Scaling & Max Funding

FundedNext wins

FundedNext offers higher maximum funding, making it the better choice for traders looking to scale up. Funded accounts can reach $200K ($4M scaled), compared to FTMO's maximum of $200K ($2M scaled). For serious traders focused on growing their account size, FundedNext has the edge.

FTMOFTMO$2,000,000
VS
FundedNextFundedNext$4,000,000 (scaled from $300K)
✓ WINS
6

Profit Split & Payouts

FundedNext wins

FundedNext offers a superior profit-sharing arrangement. Traders keep up to 80-95% of profits, with payouts on a regular schedule. FTMO offers 80-90% with standard payouts, which is less favourable for traders maximising their earnings.

FTMOFTMO80% (up to 90% with scaling)
VS
FundedNextFundedNext80-95%
✓ WINS
7

Challenge Structure

Both firms offer comparable challenge structures. The choice between them may come down to the specific challenge format you prefer.

FTMOFTMO
≡ DRAW
VS
FundedNextFundedNext
≡ DRAW

Our Pick

FundedNext Wins This Round

Based on our side-by-side analysis, FundedNext edges ahead in this matchup. Get started today.

Read FundedNext Review

Ready to Choose?

FundedNext

FundedNext

★ Our Pick

Frequently Asked Questions

Is FTMO better than FundedNext?

Based on our analysis across 7 categories, FundedNext wins overall. It outperforms FTMO in areas including Pricing and Profit Split & Payouts. That said, both firms are reputable options for funded traders.

Which has better profit split, FTMO or FundedNext?

FundedNext offers the higher profit split. FTMO offers up to 80-90% while FundedNext offers 80-95%.

Is FTMO trustworthy?

FTMO holds an EntryLab rating of 4.80/10 based on our editorial review. We evaluate prop firms on payouts, challenge fairness, support quality, and regulatory standing. Always conduct your own due diligence before funding a challenge.

Which has a cheaper challenge fee, FTMO or FundedNext?

FundedNext offers the more affordable challenge. FTMO starts at from $155 and FundedNext starts at from $32.

What is the maximum funding at FTMO vs FundedNext?

FTMO offers maximum funded accounts of $200K ($2M scaled), while FundedNext offers up to $200K ($4M scaled). Both allow traders to scale their accounts over time.

Which is better for beginner traders, FTMO or FundedNext?

FundedNext may be more beginner-friendly due to its lower entry fee and clear challenge structure. Both firms have challenges suitable for traders at different skill levels.